Quote d1shy (
)
We could, but why would 32 be better? 64 holds more people. More potential members. Besides, worst case we set up adaptive tickets
What are adaptive tickets?
I personally don't play 64 servers, some like it. They've steadily been making the maps smaller and smaller with Hardline probably having the smallest maps and yet there still 64 man servers available.
Its just a clusterfuck.
Im not trying to be arsey, i just want to know what direction this is going?
Someone in TS was saying to you the other day about having a steady server running and "regulars" to that server can become members. I think you were under the impression servers just have a constant stream of randomers which isnt really the case. People generally favourite a server thats set up to there liking. Its what i do. I have a few now that i jump on that usually have the same people in that i chat to. Not in the clan or run the server we're just all congregating in the same place.
I understand nothings really set in stone at this point. But the servers we have now arent really servers i'd personally play on. It has one conquest large map in the rotation, not even a good one either 
All the other game types are even less suited to 64 man.
I dont know what everyone else is here to play but thats just my 2 cents. And im not saying the server set up is a bad choice, theres randomers in it now.
But
The Block - Blood Money (64 man server)
https://i.imgur.com/iWKad22.jpg
